August 5, 2013 at 1:23 pm

Sangreal, The Holy Grail: Recovering the Cosmic Science of Antiquity – Part 4

by

Sangreal_4

That the legendary Holy Grail of western esotericism has a cosmic dimension of meaning has been the theme of three articles published in the pages of The Oracle previous to this month’s contribution. The Holy Grail story has intrigued the minds and piqued the curiosity of seekers of knowledge for centuries, without, however, yielding up either its secrets or a consensus of interpretation. We ended last month’s article with a quote from a modern exploration of the Grail mythos, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, a best seller in the mid 1980s that eventually served as the main source of inspiration for The DaVinci Code, a fictionalized popularization of certain aspects of Grail symbolism.

In last month’s article I wrote of the Language of the Birds, the secret language of Initiates, Alchemists and Adepts of the Mysteries. It could either be spoken or written. I described how it was based on the use of puns, homilies, synonyms, etymologies and plays-on- words that concealed secondary and even tertiary levels of meaning that only made sense to those with the keys to decipherment and the conceptual framework to make sense of the alternate meanings. Several examples of its use relevant to the question of the Grail were presented. Another example of the use of this method and one germane to this subject matter was provided by the authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail:

“…In many of the earlier manuscripts the Grail is called the Sangraal; and even in the later version by Malory it is called the Sangreal. It is likely that some such form―Sangraal or Sangreal―was in fact the original one. It is also likely that that one word was subsequently broken in the wrong place. In other words, “Sangraal” or “Sangreal” may not have been intended to divide into “San Graal” or “San Greal”―but into “Sang Raal” or “Sang Réal.” Or, to employ the modern spelling, Sang Royal. Royal blood.”

The dual meaning arises as a result of where one chooses to break the word. Split the term Sangreal between the letters n and g it becomes San Greal, ‘Holy Grail’. Split it between the g and the r and it becomes Sang Raal, or ‘Royal Blood.’ The point here has not to do with the question of which translation for Sangreal is correct, Holy Grail’ or ‘Royal Blood’, rather it is that the mystery of the Grail includes both meanings.

So we must consider the meaning of the Grail as chalice, or platter, as it is frequently described, in association with the idea of blood as a symbol. Let’s first address the role of blood, which plays a central role both in the Christian mystery tradition and in Christian orthodoxy.

In its most well known incarnation the Grail is the cup used by Jesus Christ at the Last Supper, the Passover meal consumed on the eve of the crucifixion. Mark, chapter 14 describes the events at that sacred repast:

And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.  And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.

Last_Supper

Valentin de Boulogne – The Last Supper

So this cup, from which the twelve drank, was the Grail, and whatever substance the cup held, presumably wine, was identified with the blood of Christ himself. Through the sharing of the cup and the consumption of its contents Jesus was symbolically (we presume) passing to his disciples the quality of his blood. But we must remember that the identification of the Grail with the Eucharistic vessel was a later development. The early accounts, primarily that of Chretien de Troyes describes it in very different terms. We will come back to his work momentarily.

The anonymous early 13th century author of Perlesvaus wanted to make sure that the reader made the connection with blood at the very outset of the tale, so he declared by way of preamble: “Hear ye the history of the most holy vessel that is called the Grail, in which the precious blood of Jesus was received on the day that He was put on the Cross.”

The importance of the ‘precious’ blood of Jesus is implied in the very first verses of the New Testament. Matthew, chapter 1, verses 1 through 16 identifies the bloodline stretching from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob through David and Solomon down to Joseph, “the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus.” David and Solomon, both being kings must have borne the ‘royal blood’ as history has shown this to be the prerequisite for kingship throughout almost all ancient cultures. The preeminent position of this dynastic lineage in the New Testament narrative underscores the importance of tracing the royal succession to Jesus, to connect Jesus with the bloodline of the first divinely appointed kings of Israel, even if he was not fathered by Joseph.

“. . . a blood that was deemed to be sacred and invested with magical or miraculous properties”?

The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail express the unavoidable conclusion that “Quite clearly, the Grail would appear to pertain in some way to blood and a bloodline.” The revolutionary thesis set out in their book is that the bloodline of Jesus did not, in fact, end with his death on the cross but was perpetuated through the lineage of Mary Magdalene, that she was, in a sense, the vessel, or chalice in which the royal blood was carried and transmitted to succeeding generations. The authors make a compelling case for this possibility in spite of the fact that it runs contrary to orthodox belief. The evidence they have amassed is difficult to dismiss and it does indeed seem likely that Jesus married and sired progeny. However, even accepting this possibility does not resolve the question of the Grail, rather, it deepens the mystery.  The question we must ask is this—was the importance of the bloodline of Jesus specifically, or the bloodlines of royal families in general throughout the ancient world, based merely on the need to track a hereditary transmission of secular power, or was there something unique about the blood itself that made it special, that set it apart from that of common folk, that is, in the words of Holy Blood, Holy Grail “. . . a blood that was deemed to be sacred and invested with magical or miraculous properties”? Other than the possibility of proving descent from Jesus, the authors of this work do not explore further what, if anything, constituted the “magical or miraculous properties” unique to ‘Royal Blood’ especially that of Jesus.

In search of insight into this question let us return to the Grail narrative Perceval, le Conte du Graal, (Percival, the story of the Grail) as first presented by Chretien. In his unfinished poem the pagan roots of the Mythos are less obscure than in later accounts. In fact, a Christian context for the Grail is barely discernable.

The poem commences with the story of young man living in the wild forests of Wales with his widowed mother. Initially in the story we do not know that this boys name, only later, as the story progresses do we learn that his name is Perceval. His father had been a great knight who was killed in battle, so his mother, not wanting him to follow in his father’s footsteps, raises him in the wilderness without knowledge of his heritage.

One day, while out hunting with his javelins, he encounters five knights and is so taken with them that he resolves, against his mothers wishes, to follow them to King Arthur’s court and there seek admission to train as a knight. This he does and eventually proves himself by defeating the Red Knight, who had stolen a chalice from King Arthur and shamed the Queen at the same time. After a period of training at Arthur’s court Perceval rides out in search of adventure. He apprentices under an elderly, skilled knight named Gonemans who admonishes him to be temperate in all things including in his speech and discourse. Upon leaving the old knight Perceval encounters two fishermen in a boat and is directed to a nearby castle where he may obtain succor and lodging. It is in this castle that the vision of the Grail unfolds before his awestruck eyes. When he first arrives he is led into a vast hall whereupon a squire presents him with a sword and he is told that it is given “to whom it was adjudged and destined.” Upon the sword it is written that it will never break except in “sore peril.” In the hall, seated upon a couch is an old man. As Perceval reclines another squire enters the hall bearing a white lance from which blood drips. Two more squires enter carrying two-branched candlesticks. They are followed by a beautiful damsel bearing the “graal” which shines with such a brilliant light it overwhelms the light of the candles “as the sun does that of the stars” and is so dazzling Perceval cannot even look directly at it. Finally follows another damsel bearing a beautiful, richly jeweled silver platter. During this “procession of the Grail” Perceval is wonderstruck and desirous of understanding what it all means but, remembering the admonition of Gonemans, he does not speak, nor ask any question regarding the resplendent vision.

In the morning Perceval awakens to find the castle utterly deserted. As he departs across the open drawbridge it suddenly closes almost crushing him and his horse. Once outside the castle he has an encounter with a mysterious damsel in the forest. She tells him that the old man on the couch, the host, was actually the fisherman who first directed him to the castle and that he was a king. (bearer of royal blood) She tells Percival that the king had been wounded through the thighs by the lance and the wounds had not healed. She asks him if he witnessed the procession— the sword, the bleeding lance, the ‘graal’, the silver platter—and if he asked concerning the meaning of what he saw. When she finds out the Perceval remained silent she drops a bombshell on him. She informs him that had he opened his mouth and asked after the meaning of the grail procession, that the fisherman who was a king, would have been healed of his injuries.

After further wanderings Percival encounters another damsel, only this time she is hideously repulsive. She curses him for not asking after the meaning of the lance and the grail and tells him that because of his silence the king still suffers, strife and conflict prevails and the very land itself is degenerating. Perceval vows to find the grail and redeem himself to which end he subsequently wanders for five years. As he does so the curse settles over the land, transforming it into a wasteland, and only if Perceval is successful in his quest to recover the lost Grail will the curse be lifted, the king healed, the land restored and peace and harmony prevail.

So unfolds one version of this complex and remarkable story. I have already exceeded my allotted space so allow me to interrupt the narrative until next month, when I shall continue unveiling the deep mysteries behind this extraordinary symbolism. Until then, for you serious students of Esoterica, note that the items of the Grail procession correspond to the 4 suits of the Tarot cards, the four instruments of the Magus and the four elements of Alchemy. Consider that in each case they carry parallel and complementary meanings. Contemplate on the connection of all this to the blood royal. And ponder deeply on the meaning of the white lance dripping blood, the jewel encrusted platter and a Holy Grail too brilliant to look at.

magician_tarot

The items of the Grail procession correspond to the 4 suits of the Tarot cards, the four instruments of the Magus and the four elements of Alchemy.

Continue on to Sangreal, The Holy Grail: Recovering the Lost Science of Antiquity – Part 5

  • ROBYN

    great website Randall. You know I thought I had discovered you in 1979. robyn

Facebook

YouTube

Google Plus

Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Jeff Kamuda - Excavating Wilderness: A [re]Orienting Trajectory Across Central Park

    Pinned: 2 Jan 2013