There have been rumors that the US and Russia would be teaming up to build a lunar base. Sources within the country told Popular Mechanics that the head of their space organization, Roscosmos, was set to announce a partnership agreement with NASA this week. Now, Roscosmos and NASA have both released statements saying stating the two countries’ shared “common vision for human exploration.”
They go on to say that Russia and the US will cooperate on a Moon program, specifically mentioning the Deep Space Gateway by name. That’s the base NASA plans to build in lunar orbit starting in the 2020s (the statement sets a mid-2020s goal for beginning the project). The release also mentions that other international partners are considering signing onto the lunar base
Roscosmos’ statement also outlines a rough plan to create a set of international technical standards for the lunar space station and beyond. Specifically, both docking ports and life support systems will be based on Russian design; after all, they have a lot more experience running a space station and the current life support systems aboard the ISS are in the Russian section, Zvezda.
Right now, the ISS has different ports for the multiple vehicles that dock with it. The Russian Soyuz capsule uses a different style docking port than the Space Shuttle did — the Americans had to install adapters to convert Shuttle docking ports and allow private craft like SpaceX’s Dragon to connect with them. Collaboration from the ground up, rather than making our own plans and partnering with the Russians at the last minute (like we did with the International Space Station), means that we can establish, collaborate on and coordinate technical specifications, making things easier in the medium and long term.
NASA’s relying on its much-delayed heavy lift rocket, the SLS, to build the Deep Space Gateway, but they’re only planning on launching it once a year. That timeline didn’t seem feasible, and now Roscosmos’s statement sheds some light: Russia’s rockets will help out with the construction. Both agencies, as well as other ISS partners, are tasking their countries’ respective industry partners with creating concept studies of what the Gateway might look like.
This is a big deal for many reasons; working together, despite political tensions, means that our countries are less likely to descend into outright hostilities. Additionally, NASA’s aims have been somewhat unclear for a long time. They laid out ambitious goals without a clear plan on how they were going to achieve them, and without the budget to support them. Since then, the organization has slowly been scaling back. But now, with international agreements of cooperation, it looks like the Deep Space Gateway will happen. And because it’s we have international partners, Congress will be less likely to cancel the project; after all, that’s how the International Space Station scraped by with just one vote.
Die Top-Online-Shop für viagra – https://intraspectrum-chicago.com/nl/. Niedrige Preise und hohe Qualität! Il Sildenafil, il tadalafil e il VGR devono essere usati con cautela in caso di malattie cardiovascolari
Hello Randall, I enjoy your work. Sadly mankind is being deceived with stories about NASA and other agencies collaborating to build space stations or lunar bases on the moon. I often wonder why more people haven’t asked “Why haven’t we been back to the moon for over 40 years?”Instead we shot for planets like Mars.
Until our world resolves our obsession with war we will never be welcome on the moon. Yes Welcome. I think all your readers should research the work from Dr. Steven Greer. His most recent documentary “Unacknowledged” is available FREE on Netflix or other venues online. We have had the technology to interstellar travel for over 70 years. The trillions of dollar wasted on rocket science could have been used to advanced mankind in a positive direction.This technology will solve almost every problem facing mankind today.
Thanks
Greg
We haven’t been back to the moon in 40 years because the political will to do so has been continuously sapped away by populist demagoguery complaining about “how much it cost” and “why are we spending all that money going to space when we have so many problems it could be used for here on earth”. As if the money was actually spent in space or something. (Hint: it wasn’t.)
Given NASA’s annual budget since its inception, I’m not sure where you get “trillions of dollar wasted on rocket science” (sic) but in any case, it wasn’t wasted, most of it was not on rockets, and it most certainly did advance mankind in a positive direction. The medical science and accompanying devices and techniques developed by NASA in the effort to closely monitor the health of astronauts while in space alone represents a vast and enormous benefit to mankind as a whole, and that’s only in one field. The innovations and advancements that came about as a result of the human space program are innumerable and priceless and worth it, even if it was “trillions of dollar” spent, which it wasn’t.